BESPONSA (inotuzumab ozogamicin), antineoplastic monoclonal antibody
Reason for request
- For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22 positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Phi-): low clinical benefit and no proven clinical added value compared to standard chemotherapies
- Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Phi+): clinical benefit considered insufficient to justify public funding
- BESPONSA has been granted a marketing authorisation for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory CD22 positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), Adult patient with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Phi+) should have failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). 
- In relapsed or refractory B cell ALL, no gain in overall survival has been demonstrated compared to standard chemotherapies. The haematological remission rate (80.7% versus 29.4%) and use of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (43% versus 11%) were higher in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group than in the standard chemotherapy group, with however a higher 100-day mortality post-transplant with BESPONSA than with standard chemotherapies (26% versus 6%). 
- There is a higher risk of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with BESPONSA than with standard chemotherapies; this adverse event may be serious or even fatal. 
- In relapsed or refractory Phi+ ALL, BESPONSA has no place in the therapeutic strategy. 
Clinical Benefit
| Low | - | 
| Insufficient | 
Clinical Added Value
| no clinical added value | - | 
 
	 
	                         Listen
 Listen
	 
