Reason for request
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement in the treatment of previously treated follicular lymphoma (Grade 1, 2 or 3a) in adult patients not refractory to rituximab (patients not previously treated with rituximab or who have not relapsed under treatment including rituximab or within 6 months following its discontinuation).
What therapeutic improvement ?
No clinical added value in the therapeutic strategy.
Role in the care pathway ?
In the event of relapsed follicular lymphoma in patients not refractory to rituximab, the treatments depend on the previous treatment lines, the type and duration of the remission previously obtained and the spread of the disease. They are based on :
- immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP, R-CVP, R-bendamustine) that is different from that previously initiated in order to reduce the risk of resistance (bendamustine after CHOP or vice versa) or,
- radio-immunotherapy if the degree of bone marrow involvement allows or,
- stem cell transplantation if the patient’s age allows and, in particular, in the event of early relapse.
As third and later-line therapy, treatment with ZYDELIG (idelalisib) may be proposed in patients refractory to two previous treatment lines.
Role of the medicinal product in the care pathway
In the event of relapsed follicular lymphoma in patients not refractory to rituximab, a second-line regimen is proposed. The treatment depends on the first-line therapy received, the type and duration of the remission previously obtained and the spread of the disease. The second-line treatment of patients not refractory to rituximab is based on a new chemotherapy (such as CHOP, bendamustine or CVP) in combination with rituximab. In the absence of comparative data for REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with rituximab versus standard chemotherapy regimens in combination with rituximab, its use should therefore be reserved for situations in which CHOP, bendamustine or CVP-type chemotherapy is not possible. In patients refractory to two previous treatment lines, its role compared to ZYDELIG (idelalisib) as monotherapy is not known in the absence of comparative data. The Committee highlights the fact that no data supporting the benefit of treatment with REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with rituximab for more than twelve 28-day cycles is available.
Clinical Benefit
Low |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with rituximab is low in the treatment of previously treated follicular lymphoma (Grade 1, 2 or 3a) in adult patients not refractory to rituximab (patients not previously treated with rituximab or who have not relapsed under treatment including rituximab or within 6 months following its discontinuation). |
Clinical Added Value
no clinical added value |
Considering :
the Committee deems that REVLIMID in combination with rituximab provides no clinical added value (CAV V) in the care pathway for previously treated follicular lymphoma (Grade 1, 2 or 3a) in adult patients not refractory to rituximab (patients not previously treated with rituximab or who have not relapsed under treatment including rituximab or within 6 months following its discontinuation).
|