Reason for request
Indication extension
Summary of opinion
Favourable opinion for reimbursement in the following indication: “KEYTRUDA, in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), in the treatment of FIGO 2014 Stage III (extension onto the pelvic wall or lower one-third of the vagina and/or causing hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney) to IVA (involvement of the mucosa of bladder/rectum -adjacent pelvic organ spread-) with or without involvement of the pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes) locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy.”
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), is substantial in the indication: “in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), in the treatment of FIGO 2014 Stage III (extension onto the pelvic wall or lower one-third of the vagina and/or causing hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney) to IVA (involvement of the mucosa of bladder/rectum -adjacent pelvic organ spread-) with or without involvement of the pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes) locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy.”
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- demonstration in a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study (KN-A18 trial, including 56.7% FIGO 2014 stage III - IVA patients) of the superiority of pembrolizumab compared to chemoradiotherapy, for the treatment of FIGO stage IB2-IIB and III - IVA locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy, in terms of:
- progression-free survival with an HR = 0.70 (95% CI = [0.55; 0.89]; p = 0.002 < the predefined threshold of 0.0172), 7% patients progressed or died in the experimental group versus 29.0% patients in the control group. The median PFS was not reached in either of the two groups.
- overall survival with an HR = 0.67 (95% CI = [0.50; 0.90]; p = 0.0040 < 0.01026), 2% deaths in the experimental group versus 20.5% patients in the control group. The median OS was not reached in either of the two groups.
And despite:
- the absence of any formal conclusion that can be drawn based on the quality of life findings;
- a safety profile deemed to be acceptable compared to chemoradiotherapy but marked by an excess toxicity with grade ≥ 3 AEs reported in 78.3% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 70.0% of patients in the placebo group). In addition, 20.6% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 14.9% of patients in the placebo group had an AE resulting in definitive discontinuation of pembrolizumab treatment.
The Committee deems that KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) 25 mg/ml, concentrate for solution for infusion, in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to chemoradiotherapy.
|
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
r12r2sVJFUdBrb9F